State v. Long
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child and was sentenced to life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum term of twenty-five years on each count to run concurrently. The court did not order restitution at sentencing. After Defendant filed his notice of appeal, the district court entered an order establishing restitution. Defendant appealed, contending that restitution be ordered before imposition of sentence. The Supreme Court affirmed in part and dismissed in part, holding (1) the district court had jurisdiction to impose restitution after imposing sentence; and (2) Defendant's argument that the sentencing court erred in including lifetime electronic monitoring in the journal entry of judgment was moot because the error was corrected in an amended journal entry of judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.