Rondell Walker v. State of Indiana
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Derick W. Steele Kokomo, Indiana Gregory F. Zoeller Attorney General of Indiana Gary R. Rom Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana ______________________________________________________________________________ In the Indiana Supreme Court _________________________________ FILED Jun 20 2012, 1:37 pm CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court No. 34S02-1206-CR-346 RONDELL WALKER, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee (Plaintiff below). _________________________________ Appeal from the Howard Superior Court No. 34D01-0904-FA-358 The Honorable William C. Menges, Judge _________________________________ On Petition To Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 34A02-1101-CR-612 _________________________________ June 20, 2012 Per Curiam. Rondell Walker was charged with four counts of drug crimes and two related offenses after he was stopped by police for a traffic infraction within 1,000 feet of a family housing complex. He pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine as a Class B felony and was initially referred to Drug Court. His participation in that program was later terminated, and the trial court sentenced him to twenty years, the maximum term. He appealed, claiming that he was deprived of due process during his drug court termination and sentencing hearings and that his sentence was inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character. The Court of Appeals affirmed the termination and the sentence in a Memorandum Decision. See Walker v. State, No. 34A02-1101-CR-612, slip op. (Ind. Ct. App. March 13, 2012). Having reviewed the matter, we grant transfer of jurisdiction, and direct revision of the sentence from twenty years to twelve years. See Abbott v. State, 961 N.E.2d 1016, 1017-1019 (Ind. 2012) ( but for the police officer s choice of location in stopping the car in which Abbott was a passenger, he would have received no more than the maximum three-year sentence for his possession of less than three grams of cocaine. ); Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B). In all other respects, the decision of the Court of Appeals is summarily affirmed. See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A). Dickson, C.J., and Sullivan, Rucker, and David, JJ., concur. Massa, J., would deny transfer. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
