State v. Riveira
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction for burglary, holding that the prosecutor committed misconduct but that the evidence overwhelmingly established Defendant's guilt.
During Defendant's trial, the prosecution injected victim impact evidence, spotlighting the crime's effect on the burglarized family and focusing its narrative arc on the victims' emotional state and actions after the crime. The prosecutor also told jurors that defense counsel tried to "trick" him. On appeal, Defendant argued that prosecutorial misconduct required that his conviction be vacated. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the prosecutor committed serious misconduct during trial; but (2) considering the strength of the evidence against Defendant, the misconduct had no reasonable possibility of contributing to Defendant's conviction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.