Supreme Court of Hawaii Decisions
The Hawaii Supreme Court has existed since 1841. Most of the cases that it reviews consist of appeals from decisions in lower state courts or federal courts. These may reach the Supreme Court as reserved or certified questions, or as writs of certiorari. The Court oversees the legal profession in the state and holds exclusive jurisdiction over matters related to the discipline of attorneys and judges. It also holds the exclusive authority to set rules that control procedures in lower state courts, and it has exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving elections.
Five justices serve on the Hawaii Supreme Court. Rather than electing justices, the state uses an assisted appointment method. This means that the Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission compiles a list of candidates for the review of the Governor. Once the Governor chooses a candidate from the list, the Hawaii State Senate must confirm the candidate before they can take their seat on the Court. The Chief Justice may be chosen from current members of the Court, but they also must be selected by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. Each justice serves for a 10-year term, after which the Judicial Selection Commission will decide whether to renew the term. Any candidate to serve on the Court must be a resident of Hawaii who has been licensed to practice law for at least 10 years before their appointment. Justices may not hold any other political office or actively practice law while they serve. They must be under 70 years old when they are appointed, and current justices must retire at 70.
A justice may be removed from the Hawaii Supreme Court only if the Judicial Selection Commission decides not to renew their term or if the Commission on Judicial Conduct in the Hawaii State Judiciary recommends their removal. The Commission on Judicial Conduct investigates allegations of misconduct or unfitness. The Supreme Court will make the final decision on whether to remove a justice if the Commission recommends their removal.
- 2024 (28)
- 2023 (243)
- 2022 (260)
- 2021 (297)
- 2020 (415)
- 2019 (369)
- 2018 (292)
- 2017 (297)
- 2016 (357)
- 2015 (342)
- 2014 (376)
- 2013 (422)
- 2012 (395)
- 2011 (246)
- 2010 (322)
- 2009 (327)
- 2008 (310)
- 2007 (347)
- 2006 (531)
- 2005 (567)
- 2004 (664)
- 2003 (580)
- 2002 (672)
- 2001 (485)
- 2000 (261)
- 1999 (84)
- 1998 (65)
- 1997 (49)
- 1996 (94)
- 1995 (78)
- 1994 (82)
- 1993 (33)
- 1992 (65)
- 1991 (40)
- 1990 (60)
- 1989 (59)
- 1988 (41)
- 1987 (48)
- 1986 (46)
- 1985 (58)
- 1984 (61)
- 1983 (62)
- 1982 (122)
- 1981 (77)
- 1980 (105)
- 1979 (76)
- 1978 (104)
- 1977 (68)
- 1976 (66)
- 1975 (39)
- 1974 (48)
- 1973 (65)
- 1972 (51)
- 1971 (49)
- 1970 (65)
- 1969 (49)
- 1968 (58)
- 1967 (36)
- 1966 (25)
- 1965 (17)
- 1964 (31)
- 1963 (29)
- 1962 (30)
- 1961 (28)
- 1960 (34)
- 1959 (5)
- 1957 (1)
Recent Decisions From the Supreme Court of Hawaii
Date: March 5, 2024
Docket Number: SCAP-22-0000368
Justia Opinion Summary: In the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, four plaintiffs, Sonia Davis, Jessica Lau, Lauralee Riedell, and Adam Walton, challenged the actions of the County of Maui, the County of Maui Office of the Mayor, and other…
Date: February 29, 2024
Docket Number: SCAP-22-0000552
Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii addressed the calculation of damages in cases where a condominium association wrongfully forecloses on a unit owner. Stephen Wong, the plaintiff, had bought a condo in the Harbor…
Date: February 12, 2024
Docket Number: SCAP-23-0000011
Justia Opinion Summary: In a case regarding the timing of appeals, the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii has clarified the interpretation of Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(3). The case arose from a tax dispute between…
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.