Skiles v. Ige

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

SCPW-21-0000549 Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-21-0000549 27-OCT-2021 01:44 PM Dkt. 6 ODDP IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I BETTY SKILES, Petitioner, vs. DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, State of Hawai‘i, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Betty Skiles’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on October 8, 2021, the supporting documents, and the record, the issue presented in the petition does not warrant this court’s intervention by way of an extraordinary writ, and petitioner has alternative means to seek relief, including seeking relief in the circuit court as provided by law. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (with respect to a public official, mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 27, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd E. Eddins 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.