Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKee

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 22699 16-APR-2021 08:12 AM Dkt. 166 ORD NO. 22699 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. SANDY C. MCKEE (aka SANDY C. NITTA), Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 94-082-4173, 96-050-4850, 98-102-5593, 99-001-5831, 99-017-5847, 99-018-5848, 99-259-6089, 99-260-6090, 99-261-6091, 99-262-6092, 99-263-6093, 99-338-6168, 99-369-6199, 99-370-6200) ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of the April 8, 2021 motion, filed by Bradley Tamm, as Trustee Administrator at the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), and the record in this matter, we conclude that, insofar as the documents from this trusteeship that remain unclaimed have been in the possession of ODC for 22 years, and have been the subject of successive rounds of notice to former clients of attorney Sandy McKee, nothing further is to be accomplished by preserving the original paper documents an additional six years, insofar as Rule 2.20(h) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (2021), authorizes their storage in perpetuity in the electronic record of this case. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. ODC may upload the documents into the docket of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC may thereafter securely destroy the original paper documents at its convenience. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 16, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.