Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dubin

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-19-0000561 28-SEP-2020 10:45 AM SCAD-19-0000561 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. GARY VICTOR DUBIN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case Nos. 16-O-147, 16-O-151, 16-O-213, and 16-O-326) ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Leonard, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon a thorough and careful de novo review of the September 21, 2020 motion for reconsideration, filed by Respondent Gary Dubin, and a de novo review of the entire record in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied, as well as the requests for relief set forth therein, with the exception of the effective date of Respondent Dubin’s disbarment, which is extended 31 days, to Monday, November 9, 2020. No further extensions shall be granted. Respondent Dubin shall therefore file the declaration required by Rule 2.16(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i by November 19, 2020. Finally, pursuant to this court’s September 9, 2020 order, Respondent Dubin remains obligated to pay the $19,885.00 in restitution and to submit proof of that payment to this court by October 9, 2020. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i September 28, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Katherine G. Leonard 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.