Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000502 20-JUN-2019 09:06 AM SCWC-18-0000502 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I DWIGHT J. VICENTE, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant-Appellant, vs. HILO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LTD., Respondent/Employer-Appellee-Appellee, and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY/AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee, and JOHN MULLEN & COMPANY, INC., Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-18-0000502; CASE NO. AB 2015-259(H)(S); DCD NO. 1-87-00882) ORDER DENYING “MOTION TO RECONSIDER” (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) On June 12, 2019, petitioner/claimant-appellant Dwight J. Vicente filed a “Motion to Reconsider,” in which he asks this court to reconsider the June 5, 2019 order rejecting his application for writ of certiorari. A rejection of an application for writ of certiorari, however, is not subject to reconsideration. See HRAP Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. The rejection of an application for certiorari shall be final.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Motion to Reconsider” is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 20, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.