Karagianes v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000509 25-JUN-2019 09:37 AM SCWC-17-0000509 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I GARY KARAGIANES, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee, CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000509; S.P.P. NO. 16-1-0007; CR. NO. 92-0340) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge To#oto#o in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused) Upon consideration of Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Gary Karagianes’ application for writ of certiorari and the record, it appears that, while Petitioner timely obtained an extension of time to file an application for writ of certiorari from the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ March 27, 2019 judgment on appeal, Petitioner tendered his application for writ of certiorari to prison authorities after the extended filing deadline. See HRS § 602-59(c); HRAP Rule 40.1(a)(1) and (2); Setala v. J.C. Penney Co., 97 Hawai#i 484, 486, 40 P.3d 886, 888 (2002). untimely. The application for writ of certiorari, therefore, is Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 25, 2019. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Fa#auuga To#oto#o 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.