Kaneshiro v. Eleven

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000848 03-OCT-2017 01:36 PM SCWC-15-0000848 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I KEITH M. KANESHIRO, in his official capacity as the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu, on behalf of the State of Hawai#i, Respondent/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. ELEVEN (11) PRODUCTS DIRECT SWEEPSTAKES MACHINES (TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE: $38,500.00), FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ($457.00); ONE (1) CAM SECURITY DIGITAL RECORDING SYSTEM (ESTIMATED VALUE: $200.00) (TOTAL AGGREGATE VALUE: $39,157.00), Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and PJY ENTERPRISES, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellee, and WINNER’Z ZONE; APRIL WHITING-HARAGUCHI, TRACY YOSHIMURA, and WENDY WAGNER, Respondents/Interested Persons-Appellees. (CAAP-15-0000848; S.P. NO. 14-1-0567) CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000848; S.P. NO. 14-1-0567; CAAP-15-0000849; S.P. NO. 14-1-0568; CAAP-15-0000850; S.P. NO. 14-1-0569; CAAP-15-0000852; S.P. NO. 14-1-0570; CAAP-15-0000854; S.P. NO. 14-1-0571; CAAP-15-0000855; S.P. NO. 14-1-0572) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Claimant-Appellee PJY Enterprises’ application for writ of certiorari, filed on August 8, 2017, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall file a supplemental brief, not to exceed ten pages and within twenty days after this order is issued, addressing the effect (if any) of United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars ($8,850) in U.S. Currency, 461 U.S. 555 (1983) on this appeal. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 3, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.