The Bank of New York Mellon v. R. Onaga, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000426 03-NOV-2016 12:14 PM SCWC-14-0000426 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF THE CWMBS 2006-10 TRUST, MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-10, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. R. ONAGA, INC., a Hawai#i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, and ROBERT NISPEROS MARQUEZ; MARLYN MIRANDA MARQUEZ; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., solely as nominee for CASTLE & COOKE MORTGAGE, LLC, a Hawai#i corporation; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and LYLE ANTHONY FERRARA and LINDA SUSAN FERRARA, Petitioners/Intervenors. (CIVIL NO. 11-1-2095) R. ONAGA, INC., a Hawai#i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, vs. ROBERT NISPEROS MARQUEZ; MARLYN MIRANDA MARQUEZ; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, TRUSTEE; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S.A., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees., and LYLE ANTHONY FERRARA and LINDA SUSAN FERRARA, Petitioners/Intervenors. (CIVIL NO. 12-1-1758) CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000426) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused) Petitioners/Intervenors’ application for writ of certiorari filed on September 21, 2016, is hereby accepted, and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 3, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Glenn J. Kim 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.