Abordo v. Department of Public Safety

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0001474 28-APR-2015 09:52 AM SCWC-13-0001474 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I EDMUND M. ABORDO, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (DPS), SHARI KIMOTO, MAINLAND BRANCH ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0001474; CIVIL NO. 11-1-2228) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/PlaintiffAppellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed April 24, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”). DATED: Edmund M. Abordo petitioner pro se Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 28, 2015. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.