Dacanay v. Sakamoto

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0004663 01-MAY-2014 01:25 PM SCPW-13-0004663 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I FELIX DACANAY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS and THE GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Petitioners, vs. HONORABLE KARL K. SAKAMOTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge, and CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I and IMELDA MARCOS AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCOS and IMELDA MARCOS, INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 88-0522-02) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioners Felix Dacanay, as personal representative of the Estate of Roger Roxas, and The Golden Budha Corporation s petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition, filed on October 29, 2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they do not have alternative means of seeking the requested relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition is denied without prejudice. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.