Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000095 26-AUG-2013 02:35 PM SCWC-12-0000095 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I VIHN ALKIRE-CLEMEN, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant, vs. CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER, Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-insured, and CRAWFORD AND COMPANY, Respondent/Insurance Adjuster-Appellee. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000095; CASE NO. AB 2003-121(S) (2-02-09980)) ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) On August 20, 2013, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Vihn Alkire-Clemen (Petitioner) filed a document entitled Motion for New Trial or Amendment of Judgment Rule 59(a) and Rule 59(e) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Motion), which we review as a motion for reconsideration of the August 19, 2013 Order Rejecting Application for Writ of Certiorari. Our rules do not allow for reconsideration of the acceptance or rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari. Procedure Rule 40.1(h). See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner s Motion is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 26, 2013. Vihn Alkire-Clemen petitioner pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.