Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0002165 22-JUL-2013 10:59 AM SCPW-13-0002165 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STEVEN R. SCHAEFER, Petitioner, vs. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of the June 22, 2013 letter from Steven R. Schaefer, it appears that Mr. Schaefer is seeking review of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel s consideration of the complaint Mr. Schaefer filed against attorneys Hayden Aluli and Mimi Desjardins. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall file the June 22, 2013 letter as a petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 22, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.