Grandinetti v. Bobby Ross Group, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000021 06-FEB-2013 10:05 AM SCPW-13-0000021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I FRANCIS P. GRANDINETTI, aka FRANCIS GRANDINETTI III, aka FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II, with numerous "private ID" names and aliases, a Hawai#i and New York federal citizen, Petitioner, vs. BOBBY ROSS GROUP, INC. (BRG), RICH INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, and SEVERAL TEXAS AGENTS FOR NEWTON COUNTY, ET AL., FORMER SHERIFF BOBBY ROSS, GOVERNOR GEORGE BUSH, (TEXAS), DOMINION MANAGEMENT, AN OKLAHOMA AGENT, Class-Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Francis Grandinetti s Supervisory Habeas Corpus and Writ of Mandamus Petition: Texas Arrest , which was filed on January 10, 2013, and which we review as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and a writ of mandamus, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it is unclear what specific relief petitioner seeks by way of his petition. Nevertheless, petitioner presents no special reason for invoking the supreme court s original jurisdiction, see Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976) (the supreme court will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction ), and fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief, see Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.