Suzuki v. Board of Public Accountancy

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000968 10-JAN-2013 10:45 AM SCPW-12-0000968 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I NATHAN H. SUZUKI, Petitioner, vs. BOARD OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioner Nathan H. Suzuki s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on November 1, 2012, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it appears that petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the Board of Public Accountancy and/or the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs are not performing duties that are owed to him. Moreover, petitioner can seek further review in the circuit court and the appellate court, as appropriate. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); State ex rel. Marsland v. Ames, 71 Haw. 304, 306, 788 P.2d 1281, 1283 (1990) (a writ of mandamus may not be used to perform the office of an appeal ); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual s claim is clear and certain, the official s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 10, 2013. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ R. Mark Browning 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.