Sanes v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29732 NO. SCWC-29732 23-MAR-2011 08:14 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIPI FRANK SANES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF HAWAIPI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CR. NO. 05-1-2537) ORDER STRIKING PRO SE APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J.) Upon consideration of the application for writ of certiorari filed by petitioner/defendant-appellant Frank Sanes on March 21, 2011, and the record, it appears that the application for certiorari was filed by petitioner pro se, but that petitioner is represented by appointed appellate counsel and that counsel filed an application for writ of certiorari on March 16, 2011. Petitioner has not obtained appointed counsel s discharge pursuant to HawaiPi Appellate Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 50(c) or withdrawal from the appellate court or the circuit court pursuant to HRAP 50(b), and a party does not have a constitutional right to hybrid representation. See State v. Hirano, 8 Haw. App. 330, 333-36, 802 P.2d 482, 484-85, cert. denied, 71 Haw. 668, 833 P.2d 901 (1990). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se application for writ of certiorari filed by Frank Sanes is stricken and shall not be considered further. DATED: Honolulu, HawaiPi, March 23, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.