Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000483 31-OCT-2011 01:47 PM NO. SCAD-11-0000483 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. RICHARD K. GRIFFITH, Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------In re Application for the Reinstatement of RICHARD K. GRIFFITH, Applicant. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 06-089-8429, 07-170-8630) ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of the record and the Declaration and exhibits submitted by Applicant Richard K. Griffith, it appears that Applicant Griffith has, in accordance with Rule 17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), filed the required documents requesting reinstatement to the practice of law. It further appears that Applicant Griffith has fully complied with the conditions of his one-month suspension and complied with the conditions of suspension set forth by RSCH Rule 16. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 17(b), that Applicant Griffith is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai#i, effective immediately. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 31, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.