Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 26517 14-OCT-2010 11:56 AM NO. 26517 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. RONALD G.S. AU, Respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------IN RE APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF RONALD G.S. AU, Applicant. (ODC 95-242-4701, 97-213-5407, 98-064-555) (By: ORDER Nakayama, J. for the court1) Upon review of Petitioner Ronald G.S. Au s motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding 10 pages and his request to file a reply brief of 20 pages, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. Petitioner Au may file a reply brief that does not exceed 20 pages, exclusive of indexes, appendices, and statements of related cases. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 14, 2010. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Associate Justice 1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, J., Circuit Judge Crandall in place of Acoba, J., recused, Circuit Judge Trader in place of Duffy, J., recused, and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.