Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Countiss
Annotate this Case
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Countiss (Order of
Reinstatement)
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of (1) Respondent James T. Countiss's June 5, 2006 Declaration in Support of his request for reinstatement, (2) Petitioner's July 3, 2006, position statement, Respondent's July 17, 2006 declaration, and (3) the record, it appears that Respondent James T. Countiss has complied with this court's suspension order and has paid all required fees. Therefore,
James T. Countiss,
respondent pro se
Geoffrey M. Kam,
assistant disciplinary
counsel, for
petitioner
NO. 26773
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
OFFICE OF
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
JAMES T.
COUNTISS, Respondent.
(ODC
02-203-7401)
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of (1) Respondent James T. Countiss's June 5, 2006 Declaration in Support of his request for reinstatement, (2) Petitioner's July 3, 2006, position statement, Respondent's July 17, 2006 declaration, and (3) the record, it appears that Respondent James T. Countiss has complied with this court's suspension order and has paid all required fees. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), that Respondent James T. Countiss (attorney 1440) is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Hawai'i and may resume the practice of law upon payment of all required registration fees. See RSCH 17.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 10, 2006.
James T. Countiss,
respondent pro se
Geoffrey M. Kam,
assistant disciplinary
counsel, for
petitioner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
