Camerlingo v. Kim
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION *** NO. 26203 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I KIRK CAMERLINGO and DOROTHY CAMER, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Counterclaim Defendants vs. LORI J. KIM, STEVEN J. KIM, WESLEY W. ICHIDA and PAUL A. LYNCH, Defendants-Appellees/Counterclaimants and SCOT S. BROWER, Counterclaim Defendant APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 01-1-0297) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that the July 29, 2003 judgment, the Honorable Eden Elizabeth Hifo, presiding, purports to be the HRCP 58 final judgment on the claims asserted in Civil No. 01-1-0297. The judgment dismisses the defendants counterclaim, but does not enter judgment on the plaintiffs claims, as required by Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 119-120, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338-39 (1994)(The separate judgment entered pursuant to HRCP 58 must enter judgment in favor of and against the parties on the claims resolved. A statement that declares there are no other outstanding claims is not a judgment. ). The reference to the May 31, 2002 certification order on the plaintiffs claims and the statement that there are no remaining claims does not constitute entry of *** NOT FOR PUBLICATION *** judgment on the plaintiffs claims. Thus, this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 2, 2004. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
