Hutch v. Paderes

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION *** NO. 26196 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I EUGENE JAMES HUTCH, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. DOCTOR S. PADERES, NOLAN ESPINDA, DOCTOR CHUNG, TED SAKAI, RAYMOND H. SATO, GOVERNOR BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO and PATRICIA M. GUARNACCIA, Defendants-Appellees APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-3604) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that the disposition of the claims asserted in Civil No. 00-1-3604 was not reduced to a separate judgment, as required by HRCP 58. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994). jurisdiction. Thus, this appeal is premature and we lack Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 15, 2004.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.