State v. Guernsey. ICA opinion, filed 01/05/2001 [pdf], 104 Haw. 16. S.Ct. Order Granting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 02/06/2001 [pdf], 95 Haw. 199. S.Ct. Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration, filed 03/08/2004 [pdf], 104 Haw. 273.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
* * * FOR PUBLICATION * * * IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ---o0o--STATE OF HAWAI#I, Petitioner-Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. LESLIE G.O.K. GUERNSEY, Respondent-Defendant-Appellant. NO. 22767 CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CASE NO. TD 4P of 7/23/99) (HPD #99-026568) FEBRUARY 18, 2004 MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, AND DUFFY, JJ. PUBLISHED ORDER Petitioner-plaintiff-appellee State of Hawai#i [hereinafter, the prosecution ] applied for a writ of certiorari to review the published opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in State v. Guernsey, No. 22767 (Haw. App. Jan. 5, 2001), in which the ICA vacated the district court s1 judgment and remanded for a new trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether an anonymous caller s report of erratic driving is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop. Based on this court s opinion in State v. 1 The Honorable George Kimura presided over the trial. The Honorable James H. Dannenberg presided over the hearing on Guernsey s motion to suppress. * * * FOR PUBLICATION * * * Prendergast, No. 24793 (Haw. Feb. 2, 2004), we reverse the holding of the ICA and affirm the district court s judgment of conviction and sentence. The only factual distinction between this case and Prendergast is that, when a Honolulu Police Department Officer stopped Guernsey, the only two cars on the road were Guernsey s vehicle and the Officer s vehicle. In contrast, there were several cars in front of and behind the defendant in Prendergast. This distinction does not affect the Prendergast analysis. The potential danger from an intoxicated driver, even on an empty road, is still great; this danger is sufficient to distinguish the instant case from State v. Phillips, 67 Haw. 535, 696 P.2d 346 (1985). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the ICA s opinion is reversed and the district court s judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed. On the briefs: Alexa D.M. Fujise, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for petitioner-plaintiffappellee State of Hawai#i Taryn R. Tomasa and Edward K. Harada, Deputy Public Defenders, for respondent-defendantappellant Leslie G.O.K. Guernsey
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
