Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Beaman

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

INO. 19227 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. JAMES C. BEAMAN, Respondent. (ODC 03-240-7840) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon consideration of Respondent s Request by Way of Memorandum and Affidavit for Vacation of this Court s Order of Suspension Dated June 14, 2004[;] which we treat as a motion for reconsideration made pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied without prejudice to Respondent Beaman filing a subsequent motion to vacate this court s Order of Suspension, dated June 14, 2004, which is supported by an affidavit or declaration of an authorized representative of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ( ODC ) attesting to Respondent Beaman s satisfactory cooperation with ODC s investigation or disciplinary proceeding. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 20, 2004.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.