1250 Oceanside Partners v. Ibarra

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 25746 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ 1250 OCEANSIDE PARTNERS, a Hawaii limited partnership, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE RONALD IBARRA, Respondent. _________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITIONER 1250 OCEANSIDE PARTNERS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE HONORABLE RONALD IBARRA TO RESCIND HIS SUA SPONTE ORDER TRANSFERRING THE HEARING ON 1250 OCEANSIDE PARTNERS MOTION FOR THE DISQUALIFICATION OR RECUSAL OF THE HONORABLE RONALD IBARRA FROM PRESIDING AS THE JUDGE IN THIS LAWSUIT AND ITS MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS TO THE HONORABLE RIKI MAY AMANO (By: Levinson, Acting C.J., Nakayama, J., Circuit Court Judge Waldorf, in place of Acoba, J., who is unavailable, Circuit Court Judge Graulty, assigned by reason of vacancy, and Circuit Judge Chan, for Moon, C.J., who is absent) Upon consideration of Petitioner 1250 Oceanside Partners petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Judge Ronald Ibarra to rescind his sua sponte order transferring the hearing on 1250 Oceanside Partners motion for the disqualification or recusal of the Honorable Ronald Ibarra from presiding as the judge in the lawsuit and its motion for stay of proceedings to the Honorable Riki May Amano, the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that Petitioner fails to demonstrate that it is entitled to a writ of mandamus. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to any remedy Petitioner may have by way of appeal from any adverse judgment. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 10, 2003. Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., George Gusman, III, Robert D. Triantos, and Edmund W.K. Haitsuka for petitioner 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.