Peca v. Riedl

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOS. 25627 and 25840 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ALBA PECA, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. BRIGITTE R. RIEDL, Defendant-Appellee and JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS; DOE CORPORATIONS, DOE ENTITIES and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-1247) ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon consideration of appellant s letter to this court of September 12, 2003, which shall be treated as a motion for clarification of the August 29, 2003 order dismissing this appeal, the papers in support and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for clarification is denied without prejudice to appellant seeking relief in the circuit court. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 25, 2003. Alba Peca, pro se on the motion

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.