Hutch v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
*** NO T FO R PUBLICATION *** NO. 24966 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I EUGENE JAMES HUTCH, Petitioner-Appellant vs. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (S.P.P. NO. 01-1-0028) (By: SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Petitioner-appellant Eugene James Hutch appeals from the February 20, 2002 order of the circuit court of the first circuit, the Honorable Karen S.S. Ahn presiding, denying Hutch s HRPP Rule 40 petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Hutch argues that (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and (2) HAR § 17-202-1(b) hindered his access to the courts. Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we hold that the circuit court did not err by denying Hutch s HRPP Rule 40 petition without a hearing because Hutch failed to establish a colorable claim, inasmuch as Hutch failed to: (1) meet his burden of sufficiently alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, Dan v. State, 76 Hawai#i 446, 879 P.2d 551 (1994); and (2) demonstrate that HAR § 17-202-1(b) had any relation to his conviction or would change his guilty verdict, see HRPP Rule *** NO T FO R PUBLICATION *** 40(a)(1)(v). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment from which the appeal is taken is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 1, 2003. On the briefs: Eugene James Hutch, petitioner-appellant pro se Donn Fudo, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent-appellee State of Hawai#i 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
