United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO v. Cayetano
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
* * * NOT FO R PUBL ICATION * * * NO. 21838 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I Civ. No. 97-4960 In the Matter of UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO and HAWAII GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME, LOCAL 152, AFL-CIO, ComplainantsAppellants/Appellants, and HAWAII LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; BERT M. TOMASU, RUSSELL T. HIGA, and CHESTER C. KUNITAKE, Appellees/Appellees, vs. BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO, GOVERNOR STATE OF HAWAII; LAWRENCE MIIKE, M.D., DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF HAWAII; and JOHN H. WESTERMAN, ACTING CEO, HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPROATION, Respondents-Appellees/Appellees. ----------------------------------------------------------------Civ. No. 97-5033 BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO, GOVERNOR, STATE OF HAWAII; LAWRENCE MIIKE, M.D., DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF HAWAII; and JOHN H. WESTERMAN, ACTING CEO, HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Appellants/Appellees, vs. BERT M. TOMASU, RUSSELL T. HIGA, and CHESTER C. KUNITAKE, Members of the Hawaii Labor Relations Board, Appellees/Appellees, and -1- * * * NOT FO R PUBL ICATION * * * UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO and HAWAII GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME, LOCAL 152, AFL-CIO, Appellees/Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (Civ. Nos. 97-4960 & 97-5033) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, and Nakayama, JJ., and Circuit Judge Simms, assigned by reason of vacancy; Acoba, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) Plaintiffs-appellants United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO and Hawai#i Government Employees Association, AFSCME, Local 152, AFL-CIO [hereinafter, the Unions] appeal from, inter alia, the June 28, 1998 order of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, the Honorable Kevin C.S. Chang presiding, affirming the November 10, 1997 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order of the Hawai#i Labor Relations Board (HLRB). The Unions contend that the circuit court erred in affirming the HLRB s decision because: (1) the legislature made privatization of the Hana Medical Center (HMC) contingent upon resolving the status of existing employees; (2) privatization of the HMC was a mandatory subject of collective bargaining; and (3) the relief granted by the HLRB was inadequate. Defendants-appellees Benjamin J. Cayetano, governor of the State of Hawai#i, Dr. Lawrence Miike, director of the department of health, and John H. Westerman, acting CEO of Hawai#i Health Systems Corportation [hereinafter, collectively, Employer] argue, inter alia, that this court lacks jurisdiction over the present appeal. Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the issues raised and the arguments presented, we hold that: -2- * * * NOT FO R PUBL ICATION * * * (1) because the HLRB acted within its jurisdiction in interpreting Act 263 to determine the act s effects on Employer s duties under HRS chapter 89, we have jurisdiction over this appeal; (2) based upon the plain language of Act 263, the decision to privatize the HMC was not conditioned upon resolving the status of existing employees; (3) based on this court s decision in State of Hawai#i Organization of Police Officers (SHOPO) v. Society of Professional Journalists -- University of Hawai#i Chapter, 83 Hawai#i 378, 405, 927 P.2d 386, 413 (1996), the decision to privatize the HMC was not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining; and (4) neither HRS chapter 89 nor chapter 377 granted the HLRB jurisdiction over the Hana Community Health Corporation, Inc. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the circuit court s July 28, 1998 judgment affirming the November 10, 1997 findings of fact, conclusions of law and order of the HLRB is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 10, 2003. On the briefs: Herbert T. Takahashi and Rebecca L. Covert (of Takahashi, Masui & Vasconcellos), for complainants-appellants/ appellants Ruth I. Tsujimura, Douglas H. Inouye, and Kris N. Nakagawa, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents-appellees/ appellees Valri Lei Kunimoto, for appellees/appellees -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
