Arakawa v. Nakatani
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24836 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ CLYDE S. ARAKAWA, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE GAIL C. NAKATANI, in her official capacity as Administrative Judge of the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, and STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 01-1-0942) (By: ORDER Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon consideration of Petitioner Clyde Arakawa s application for a writ of mandamus, the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that: (1) Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus; and (2) Petitioner will have a remedy by way of appeal if he is convicted of the charged offense. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to any remedy Petitioner may have by way of appeal. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 30, 2002.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
