Von Tempsky Family Partnership v. Edelman
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24727 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ VON TEMPSKY FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, a Hawaii Partnership, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, vs. JOEL EDELMAN and JEANNINE FARR-EDELMAN, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, JOEL EDELMAN and JEANNINE FARR-EDELMAN, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. LYNN VON TEMPSKY and ROBBIE VON TEMPSKY, Third-Party Defendnats-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIV. NO. WO1-412) (By: ORDER Levinson, J., for the court1) Upon consideration of Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants Joel Edelman and Jeannine Farr-Edelman s motion for injunction and/or stay pending appeal, the papers in support and opposition, and the records and files herein, it appears that Appellants fail to demonstrate that they are entitled to an injunction or a stay pending appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for injunction or stay pending appeal is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 8, 2002. FOR THE COURT: STEVEN H. LEVINSON Associate Justice 1 Considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
