State v. Stanley

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 24151 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. DIANE LISA STANLEY, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT, HILO DIVISION (REPORT NOS. G-38249 through G-38255, G-38258) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that the district court s order denying the motion to suppress evidence is an interlocutory order that is appealable by appellant only upon entry of final judgment. See HRS § 641-12; State v. Valiani, 57 Haw. 133, 552 P.2d 75 (1976). been entered against appellant. A judgment of conviction has not Thus, the appeal of the interlocutory order is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 25, 2001.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.