State v. Grindling

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 23810 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI» I STATE OF HAWAI» I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. CHRISTOPHER GRINDLING, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (CR. NO. 98-0325(3)) ORDER SUSPENDING TIME REQUIREMENT OF HRAP RULE 40(d) (By: Acoba, J.) Pursuant to HRAP Rules 2 and 26(b), the time requirement of HRAP Rule 40(d) is hereby suspended, and the time in which this court shall dispose of the pending motion for reconsideration is extended through November 15, 2001. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai» i, October 22, 2001. Associate Justice Christopher Grindling appellant pro se on the motion

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.