State v. Apo

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 23768 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. KAIMANA KAINALU APO, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (CR. NO. 99-0535) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the September 26, 2000 notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the September 7, 2000 announcement of the decision denying the motion for reduction of sentence, but before entry of the order denying the motion; (2) the notice of appeal would have been deemed filed when the order denying the motion for reduction of sentence was entered; HRAP 4(b)(2); (3) an order denying the motion for reduction of sentence has not been entered; and thus, (4) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. § 641-11; HRAP 4(b)(1) and 4(b)(3). HRS Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 11, 2001.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.