State v. Bani

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 22196 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. ETO BANI, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CR. NOS. 98-13141 AND 98186306) ORDER SUSPENDING TIME REQUIREMENT OF HRAP RULE 40(d) Pursuant to HRAP Rules 2 and 26(b), the time requirement of HRAP Rule 40(d) is hereby suspended, and the time in which this court shall dispose of the pending motion for reconsideration is extended through January 31, 2002. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 21, 2001. Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.