State v. Bani

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ---o0o--_________________________________________________________________ STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. ETO BANI, Defendant-Appellant _________________________________________________________________ NO. 22196 MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND ORDER OF AMENDMENT (CR. NOS. 98-13141 and 98186306) DECEMBER 6, 2001 MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and RAMIL, JJ., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE GRAULTY, ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii s motion for clarification, filed on November 29, 2001, is granted. The opinion of the court, filed on November 21, 2001, is amended as follows (deleted material is bracketed and new material is underscored): Page 3, first paragraph, third sentence: In our view, the absence of any procedural safeguards in the public notification provision of HRS chapter 846E renders the [statute] public notification portion of HRS chapter 846E unconstitutional, void, and unenforceable. The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing amendment into the original opinion. Mangmang Qiu Brown, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for plaintiffappellee on the motion -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.