State v. Pedro
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23723 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. AUA PEDRO, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CR. NO. 96-0986) (By: ORDER Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant Aua Pedro s motion for dismissal of his appeal, the declaration in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that in his declaration appended to the motion for dismissal, DefendantAppellant states: (1) he understands he has a right to appeal; (2) he understands the consequences of dismissing the appeal and that he cannot reactivate his appeal once it is dismissed; and (3) he voluntarily moves to dismiss his appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for dismissal of appeal is granted pursuant to HRAP Rule 42(c), and this appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 28, 2000.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
