The H.E. Johnson Co., Inc. v. Emma International, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23694 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I THE H.E. JOHNSON COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant vs. EMMA INTERNATIONAL, INC. and BANK OF HONOLULU, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-50; MARY DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE CORPORATIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES 1-50, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 91-4242) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the statements supporting and contesting jurisdiction and the record, it appears that: (1) the August 1, 2000 order granting the motion to dismiss the complaint has not been reduced to a separate judgment, as required by HRCP 58; and, thus; (2) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 26, 2000.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
