In re Doe Children

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23611 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I IN THE INTEREST OF DOE CHILDREN: JOHN DOE Born on November 13, 1990 JOHN DOE Born on June 3, 1992 (NO. 23611 (FC-S NO. 97-04815)) ----------------------------------------------------------------IN THE INTEREST OF JANE DOE Born May 20, 1993 (NO. 23612 (FC-S NO. 97-04816)) ----------------------------------------------------------------IN THE INTEREST OF JOHN DOE Born December 8, 1994 (NO. 23613 (FC-S NO. 97-04817)) APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (FC-S NOS. 97-04815, 97-04816, & 97-04817) ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS BY FATHER-APPELLANT (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) fatherappellant's right to appeal the May 26, 2000 permanent custody orders entered in FC-S Nos. 97-04815, 97-04816 and 97-04817 was conditioned upon the filing by father-appellant of motions for reconsideration of the May 26, 2000 orders; see HRS § 571-54; In re Jane Doe, 77 Hawai#i 109, 113, 883 P.2d 30, 34 (1994); In re Jane Doe, 3 Haw. App. 391, 394, 651 P.2d 492, 494 (1982); (2) no motions for reconsideration were filed by father-appellant; (3) the motions for reconsideration filed on May 26, 2000 by mother-appellant sought reconsideration of the May 26, 2000 orders only as to mother-appellant and the record of the reconsideration hearing indicates that the May 26, 2000 orders were reconsidered by the family court only as to motherappellant; and, thus, (4) the jurisdictional requirements for appeal have not been met as to father-appellant and we lack jurisdiction over father-appellant's appeals. HRS § 571-54. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeals by fatherappellant are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 21, 2000. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.