State v. Penaflor
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23608 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. CRANDALL PENAFLOR, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (CR. NO. 90-0146(2)) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, and Ramil, JJ., and Circuit Judge Pollack, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the February 28, 2000 motion for correction of sentence under HRPP Rule 35 has not been finally decided; (2) the appeal of the July 7, 2000 order denying appointment of substitute counsel in the Rule 35 matter is an appeal of an interlocutory order for which leave to file an interlocutory appeal was not granted by the circuit court; and thus, (3) we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 23, 2000.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
