Velasco v. Paglinawan.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23564 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I LEONARDO VELASCO, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. SHERYLL PAGLINAWAN and THELMA TUITELELEAPAGA, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, and DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 98-2860) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the June 6, 2000 order dismissing the plaintiff s claims against the defendants has not been reduced to a separate judgment, as required by Rule 58 of the Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure; and thus, (2) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 26, 2000.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
