Wong v. Royal Hawaiian Country Club Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23367 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ LEONARD WONG and CHERYL WONG, Plaintiffs-Appellants vs. ROYAL HAWAIIAN COUNTRY CLUB INC.; Y.Y. VALLEY CORPORATION; YASUO YASUDA; ROBERT CARTER; HIROSHI KOBAYASHI; EUGENE LUM; NORMA LUM; ERNEST SOUZA; JOHN DOES and JANE ROES 1 THROUGH 30, Defendants-Appellees (NO. 23367 (CIV. NO. 88-1919-06)) ----------------------------------------------------------------LEONARD WONG and CHERYL WONG, Plaintiffs-Appellants vs. ROYAL HAWAIIAN COUNTRY CLUB INC.; Y.Y. VALLEY CORPORATION; YASUO YASUDA; ROBERT CARTER; HIROSHI KOBAYASHI; EUGENE LUM; NORMA LUM; ERNEST SOUZA; JOHN DOES and JANE ROES 1 THROUGH 30, Defendants-Appellees (NO. 23368 (CIV. NO. 88-2719-08)) _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NOS. 88-1919-06 and 88-2719-08) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that this court informed Appellants Leonard Wong and Cheryl Wong by letter dated September 22, 2000 that the time for filing the opening brief expired on September 14, 2000 and that, pursuant to Rule 30 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such action as the court deemed proper including dismissal of the appeal; and appellants having failed to respond to said letter or to otherwise oppose dismissal; therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 3, 2000. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
