Beasley v. State
Annotate this CaseThe Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Curtis W. Beasley’s motion filed pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Beasley was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Beasley was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of ten to two. Beasley’s sentence of death became final in 2001. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Beasley’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Beasley’s motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.