Rodriguez v. State
Annotate this CaseAppellant was convicted of first-degree murder, armed robbery, and other offenses. The jury recommended by a vote of twelve to zero that Appellant be sentenced to death for the murder. The trial court followed the jury’s recommendation and sentenced Appellant to death. The Supreme Court affirmed his death sentence on direct appeal. Appellant later filed a motion for postconviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing on two ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims related to Appellant’s alleged intellectual disability, the circuit court denied postconviction relief. The court also denied Appellant’s first and second successive postconviction motions. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the circuit court did not err in refusing to grant an evidentiary hearing on Appellant’s intellectual disability claim; and (2) Appellant was not entitled to relief under Hurst v. State.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.