Virgil Lee Harris v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-258 ____________ VIRGIL LEE HARRIS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [April 2, 2015] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Harris, 129 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct Conflict of Decisions Third District - Case No. 3D12-1996 (Miami-Dade County) Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and James A. Moody, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, and Jill Diane Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.