Lockhart v. Crews
Annotate this CasePetitioner was convicted and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment for robbery. The court of appeal affirmed the judgment of guilty and the sentence imposed. Thereafter, Petitioner filed numerous postconviction claims. The petition filed in this case was Petitioner’s twenty-seventh petition for review or extraordinary writ petition filed in the Supreme Court pertaining to his criminal case. The petition was one for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court dismissed the petition as unauthorized pursuant to Baker v. State and issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se filings in the Court related to his criminal case. Petitioner did not file a response but instead filed several handwritten “motions” asserting the same challenges to his conviction and sentence that he presented in other filings. The Supreme Court denied the motions, concluded that Petitioner’s petition was procedurally barred as well as a frivolous proceeding, and imposed sanctions upon Petitioner.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.