Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Barbara J. Phillips, etc., et al

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2013 CASE NO(S).: SC11-2513 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2D10-2144, 07-0080-CA RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Petitioner(s) vs. BARBARA J. PHILLIPS, ETC., ET AL. Respondent(s) We grant the Respondents Motion for Clarification, and the opinion, dated May 16, 2013, is withdrawn, and the revised opinion, dated May 16, 2013, is substituted in its place. In granting the Motion for Clarification, we have not ruled on whether the delayed discovery doctrine is applicable or whether this doctrine has been waived, as the Petitioner contends. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., dissents. A True Copy Test: __________________________ John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court Served: HALA A. SANDRIDGE DOMINIQUE E. HELLER GEORGE LOUIS GUERRA ROBERT J. PEARL EDWARD MAURICE MULLINS SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ Case No(s). SC11-2513 Page 2 JEFFREY R. SONN JOSEPH C. COATES, III BRADFORD D. KAUFMAN HON. JAMES BIRKHOLD, CLERK DAVID A. WEINTRAUB JEREMY MICHAEL COLVIN RAQUEL A. RODRIGUEZ LEAH A. SEVI KEVIN CARROLL ALEX JOSEPH SABO, II JASON MICHAEL FEDO IRA D. HAMMERMAN RONALD D. SHINDLER JON POLENBERG VERONICA TEJADA LACAYO ANNA V. TUMPOVSKIY MATTHEW JOHN CONIGLIARO

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.