Green v. Tucker
Annotate this CaseIn 2005, Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for committing two sex offenses. Since 2009, Petitioner, an inmate in state custody, had filed six previous extraordinary writ petitions with the Supreme Court seeking various forms of relief related to his convictions or sentences. Each of Petitioner's extraordinary writ petitions filed with the Supreme Court was devoid of merit or inappropriate for consideration. Therefore, the Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any subsequent pro se filings in the Court regarding his convictions. After considering Petitioner's response, the Court concluded that it failed to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. In the meantime, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Supreme Court alleging that his sentences were illegal. The Court further concluded that Petitioner's procedurally barred petition filed in this case was a frivolous proceeding brought before the Court by a state prisoner, and accordingly, the Clerk of Court was instructed to reject any future pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by Petitioner regarding his convictions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.