Richardson v. Tucker, etc.
Annotate this CasePetitioner, an inmate in state custody, filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus with the court challenging his conviction and sentence. Since petitioner's criminal case became final, petitioner had unsuccessfully brought numerous collateral proceedings in the district court seeking relief related to his criminal case. Because the petition in this case was petitioner's eleventh extraordinary writ petition filed with the court, the court issued an order directing him to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se filings. After considering petitioner's response, the court concluded that it failed to show cause why he should not be sanctioned. Further, the court concluded that petitioner's unauthorized petition was a frivolous proceeding brought to the court by a prisoner.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.