Craig B. Daniels v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-1646 ____________ CRAIG B. DANIELS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [November 8, 2012] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in Daniels v. State, 66 So. 3d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct Conflict of Decisions First District - Case No. 1D11-969 (Walton County) Carlos Fernando Gonzalez of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals Division, and Charles Richey McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.